Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932400AbVIFFGE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:06:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932399AbVIFFGD (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:06:03 -0400 Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.94]:16512 "HELO smtp111.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932400AbVIFFGC (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:06:02 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: GFS, what's remainingh Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:05:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lars Marowsky-Bree , Andi Kleen , linux clustering , akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050901104620.GA22482@redhat.com> <200509052307.27417.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <200509060058.44934.phillips@istop.com> In-Reply-To: <200509060058.44934.phillips@istop.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509060005.59578.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1605 Lines: 35 On Monday 05 September 2005 23:58, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Tuesday 06 September 2005 00:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Monday 05 September 2005 23:02, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > By the way, you said "alpha server" not "alpha servers", was that just a > > > slip? Because if you don't have a cluster then why are you using a dlm? > > > > No, it is not a slip. The application is running on just one node, so we > > do not really use "distributed" part. However we make heavy use of the > > rest of lock manager features, especially lock value blocks. > > Urk, so you imprinted on the clunkiest, most pathetically limited dlm feature > without even having the excuse you were forced to use it. Why don't you just > have a daemon that sends your values over a socket? That should be all of a > day's coding. > Umm, because when most of the code was written TCP and the rest was the clunkiest code out there? Plus, having a daemon introduces problems with cleanup (say process dies for one reason or another) whereas having it in OS takes care of that. > Anyway, thanks for sticking your head up, and sorry if it sounds aggressive. > But you nicely supported my claim that most who think they should be using a > dlm, really shouldn't. Heh, do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without ever seeing the code? -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/