Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750991AbVIFVxf (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:53:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750992AbVIFVxf (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:53:35 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:5304 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990AbVIFVxf (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:53:35 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Demand faulting for hugetlb From: Adam Litke To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "ADAM G. LITKE [imap]" Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 16:53:31 -0500 Message-Id: <1126043611.3123.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 827 Lines: 19 I am sending out the latest set of patches for hugetlb demand faulting. I've incorporated all the feedback I've received from previous discussions and I think this is ready for some more widespread testing. Is anyone opposed to spinning this in -mm as it stands? The three patches: 1) Remove a get_user_pages() optimization that is no longer valid for demand faulting 2) Move fault logic from hugetlb_prefault() to hugetlb_pte_fault() 3) Apply a simple overcommit check so demand fault accounting behaves in a manner in line with how prefault worked Diffed against 2.6.13-git6 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/