Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932493AbVIHAtN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:49:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932490AbVIHAtN (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:49:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:1928 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932479AbVIHAtM (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:49:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:49:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: James Bottomley cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List , Jens Axboe , Greg KH Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1126053452.5012.28.camel@mulgrave> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1086 Lines: 27 On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Quite frankly, what's the point in asking people to pull a tree that is > known to not compile? Btw, I see the patch that is supposed to fix it, but I'm in no position to know whether it's even acceptable to basically double the size of the "struct klist", for example. There may be a good reason why Greg hasn't been merging the klist stuff, and just assuming that they are merged not only screws up everybody down-stream, it's not necessarily valid in the first place. In other words, I think I will have to just revert the commit that introduces this bogus "assume a patch that wasn't merged" (commit ID 2b7d6a8cb9718fc1d9e826201b64909c44a915f4) for now. And once more strongly complain about it getting sent to me in the first place since it was known to not even compile. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/