Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932498AbVIHBA5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 21:00:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932496AbVIHBA5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 21:00:57 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:47500 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932483AbVIHBA4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2005 21:00:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 17:59:06 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Linus Torvalds Cc: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de, greg@kroah.com Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13 Message-Id: <20050907175906.09b0a46f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1126053452.5012.28.camel@mulgrave> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 991 Lines: 26 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Quite frankly, what's the point in asking people to pull a tree that is > > known to not compile? James was assuming you'd merged the klist patch whcih I'd sent beforehand. > Btw, I see the patch that is supposed to fix it, but I'm in no position to > know whether it's even acceptable to basically double the size of the > "struct klist", for example. There may be a good reason why Greg hasn't > been merging the klist stuff, This patch came out around the time Greg went walkabout. I'd suggest we merge the klist patch anyway, so it doesn't hold up scsi. If Greg wants to fix that bug by other means later on, we can do that anytime. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/