Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:31:48 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, phillips@istop.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1 of 4] Configfs is really sysfs
Message-ID: <20050907203148.GA6701@kroah.com>
References: <200508310854.40482.phillips@istop.com> <20050830231307.GE22068@insight.us.oracle.com> <20050830162846.5f6d0a53.akpm@osdl.org> <20050904035341.GO8684@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20050904041224.GP8684@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20050904044136.GR8684@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20050904045444.GS8684@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050904045444.GS8684@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 759
Lines: 18

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:54:45PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> 	Finally, assuming that the sysfs_dirent/configfs_dirent
> arrangement is pretty fleshed out, I think that perhaps this backing
> store could be joined.  Again, no more magic could be added, and it
> would have to handle the sysfs and configfs types in concurrence, but I
> think it could be done.  Again, sysfs folks, please comment.

Thanks for the good explainations.  I still agree with Joel that these
need to be separate fses.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/