Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 07:50:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 07:50:19 -0500 Received: from [62.172.234.2] ([62.172.234.2]:20524 "EHLO saturn.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 07:50:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 12:50:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Tigran Aivazian To: Larry McVoy cc: Christoph Rohland , Michael Rothwell , richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) In-Reply-To: <20001108235312.H22781@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Larry McVoy wrote: > As long as Linus continues in his current role, I doubt much of > anything that the big iron boys do will really make it back into the > generic kernel. That is great, thank you. At least I know now someone on this planet who agrees with me! Everyone (regardless of whether he has seen commercial UNIX source or not, but it pains most to hear from those who have) seems to be sceptical when I say exactly the above. They think "how could that possibly be -- the "big iron Unixen" had such a large investment of real money to make them full of "enterprise-features", surely there must be something useful for Linux to learn from". To which I reply -- "most (probably 99-100%) Linux kernel hackers have access to the source code of most (probably 40%-90% depending on their lack) flavours of commercial UNIX and would be quite happy to "steal" code from it (as long as they, like myself agree with RMS philosophy/morals) but the reality is -- there is _nothing_ to steal from it". Commercial UNIXen are just useless -- we _have_ to rewrite everything from scratch, not because we can't steal (or think it immoral) but because there is nothing interesting to steal left. The free stuff is actually better and technically superior to that which is not free. To contradict to myself (just a tiny bit!) I think it would still be useful for the public in general (by "public in general" I meant those clueless individuals who write the laws men have to obey) to recognize the above fact and let the hackers be no longer shy about it, i.e. be able to freely discuss any information they have (or had) access to, so that, in the unlikely case that there is something useful to "steal" from it, they can take it freely and put it into Linux. Regards, Tigran PS. The very fact I can say the above and still (hope to) have a job afterwards is a sign of much progress towards the better end :) PPS. Better is the end of a thing than the beginning thereof: and the patient in spirit is better than the proud in spirit. (Eccl 7:8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/