Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932270AbVIIPCx (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:02:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932557AbVIIPCw (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:02:52 -0400 Received: from smtp.dkm.cz ([62.24.64.34]:9476 "HELO smtp.dkm.cz") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932270AbVIIPCw (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:02:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4321A40C.6080205@rulez.cz> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:02:36 +0200 From: iSteve User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: query_modules syscall gone? Any replacement? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1060 Lines: 25 Greetings, I'm coding an application that messes with modules a lot, and I've stumbled upon a query_modules syscall in my docs. Later I've found out that the docs come from modutils and that module-init-tools doesn't seem to document (any of) the syscalls. May I then ask, why is the query_module syscall gone? And more importantly, what replaces it, if anything? It seems to me that parsing the /proc/modules is not only less comfortable, but according to the very obsolete manpage I have, it also can provide less information. For exmaple I'm not aware of anything like QM_SYMBOLS on per-module basis like it was (do correct me if I am wrong, it'd simplify my work a lot), ... and getting QM_REFS for example requires extensive parsing of /proc/modules. Thanks in advance for reply. - iSteve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/