Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:28:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:28:27 -0500 Received: from cerebus-ext.cygnus.co.uk ([194.130.39.252]:42493 "EHLO passion.cygnus") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:28:13 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <00110822033500.04252@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <00110822033500.04252@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk> <200011081205.eA8C5ui27838@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> <00110819463200.01915@dax.joh.cam.ac.uk> <3A09B856.EC897A92@mvista.com> To: "James A. Sutherland" Cc: George Anzinger , Horst von Brand , "Jeff V. Merkey" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Installing kernel 2.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 13:25:50 +0000 Message-ID: <12370.973776350@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org jas88@cam.ac.uk said: > I think a default whereby the kernel built will run on any > Linux-capable machine of that architecture would be sensible - so if I > grab the 2.4.0t10 tarball and build it now, with no changes, I'll be > able to boot the kernel on any x86 machine. I have four machines on my desk at the moment. The workstation is a dual P-III. I suppose I agree that it might be nice if the kernel for that also worked on the embedded 386 board. But it'd also be nice if it worked on the Alpha and the SH boards which are also on my desk. How about putting the whole lot into a single kernel image? It's the logical extension of what's being suggested. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/