Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751006AbVILORd (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:17:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751009AbVILORd (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:17:33 -0400 Received: from host62-24-231-115.dsl.vispa.com ([62.24.231.115]:57475 "EHLO orac.walrond.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002AbVILORc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:17:32 -0400 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm3 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:17:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050912024350.60e89eb1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050912024350.60e89eb1.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509121517.31562.andrew@walrond.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 657 Lines: 16 On Monday 12 September 2005 10:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > - An update to the anticipatory scheduler to fix a performance problem > where processes do a single read then exit, in the presence of > competing I/O acticity. Is there more discussion on this somewhere? When was the problem introduced? Bit of a long shot, but it fits the description of some problems I have noticed recently. Andrew Walrond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/