Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932243AbVILVEt (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:04:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932244AbVILVEt (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:04:49 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.200]:17728 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932243AbVILVEs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:04:48 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=alsIQez8LTxf3VeYjD/CkpbWwv0iyJDubVfxurIVN2XufpUABK3uDaXfGWtdH93Gqh1OPOGVdhmI7BnOh2kvZcVlVclQoVckWgLWhJaWkZXifA0fmGdH2+rRTpzlyIfgxDIby6bS6nds7MXn0XB4KcWmFbanjyVsAzd5kuFi7CU= Message-ID: <4d8e3fd3050912140439c14518@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:04:47 +0200 From: Paolo Ciarrocchi Reply-To: paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com To: nish.aravamudan@gmail.com Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm3 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <29495f1d05091213134d917bd7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050912024350.60e89eb1.akpm@osdl.org> <4d8e3fd305091208191fbbe804@mail.gmail.com> <29495f1d05091213134d917bd7@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1238 Lines: 32 On 9/12/05, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 9/12/05, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > On 9/12/05, Andrew Morton wrote: [...] > > > > > > - There are several performance tuning patches here which need careful > > > attention and testing. (Does anyone do performance testing any more?) > > > > How about the tool announced months ago by Martin J. Bligh ? > > > > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/abat/regression_matrix.html > > Preferred location is: test.kernel.org (much shorter too!) I wasn't aware of that, thank you! Now I won't forget anymore that URL ;-) > Also, the problem for -mm3 is that -mm2 did not build on most > machines. -mm1 did on 4/6. Probably some determination could be made > from those. I see. But I still think that automated testing is a great opportunity for the community to pinpoint problems. Is there anything we can do to make thinks work better ? -- paoloc.blogspot.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/