Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932110AbVILVdO (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:33:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932268AbVILVdO (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:33:14 -0400 Received: from [64.162.99.240] ([64.162.99.240]:35716 "EHLO spamtest2.viacore.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932110AbVILVdN (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:33:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4325F3D5.9040109@spamtest.viacore.net> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:32:05 -0700 From: Joe Bob Spamtest User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050909 Fedora/1.7.10-1.5.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Wedgwood CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Pure 64 bootloaders References: <43228E4E.4050103@jg555.com> <43229BA4.4010306@pobox.com> <20050910163446.GA2232@taniwha.stupidest.org> In-Reply-To: <20050910163446.GA2232@taniwha.stupidest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 719 Lines: 19 Chris Wedgwood wrote: >> /lib64 is an awful scheme. I'd avoid it. > I'd like to see people move away from it before it gets too entrenched > too. agreed -- as far as i'm concerned the 32 bit libraries are there for compatibility's sake and should be in /lib/compat/ instead of /lib. the native libraries should be in /lib instead of /lib64. lib64 should just go away! but then again, nobody asked for *my* input before this fhs spec came out, so ... -kelsey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/