Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932287AbVILWKb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:10:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932288AbVILWKb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:10:31 -0400 Received: from 66-23-228-155.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.228.155]:42733 "EHLO kevlar.burdell.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932287AbVILWKb (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:10:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:06:17 -0400 From: Sonny Rao To: Danny ter Haar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm3 Message-ID: <20050912220617.GA18215@kevlar.burdell.org> References: <20050912024350.60e89eb1.akpm@osdl.org> <20050912145435.GA4722@kevlar.burdell.org> <20050912125641.4b53553d.akpm@osdl.org> <20050912200914.GA13962@kevlar.burdell.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 858 Lines: 20 On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:03:12PM +0000, Danny ter Haar wrote: > Sonny Rao wrote: > >I assume you're referring to allocating huge pages? I'm not sure how > >one would test this other than allocating N huge pages, releasing, > >runing something intensive (like SDET), and then trying to allocate > >N huge pages again? Or am I off base here? > > Run a full-feed usenet server ? ;-) > I recommend INN .... Are you using jumbo frames or anything like that? I can probably replicate order > 0 allocation failures pretty easily using that, but I don't know if that's really the issue. Sonny - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/