Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:10:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:09:51 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:8974 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:09:44 -0400 Subject: Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption To: reiser@namesys.com (Hans Reiser) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 23:10:29 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), "pcg( Marc)"@goof.com (A. Lehmann), menion@srci.iwpsd.org (Joshua Schmidlkofer), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (kernel) In-Reply-To: from "Hans Reiser" at Jul 28, 2001 01:47:25 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing > By the way, how about considering the use of tests before redhat coders put stuff in the linux > kernel? You know, if VFS changes actually got tested before users encountered things like Viro > breaking ReiserFS in 2.4.5, it would be nice. > At Namesys, like all normal software shops, we actually run a test suite before shipping code > externally. We usually try to require that it be tested by at least one person in addition to the > code author. *PLONK* No doubt if Namesys ran test suites all the tail merging bug fiasco and the directory/tree balance races wouldnt have happened. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/