Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932224AbVIMFOf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:14:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932232AbVIMFOf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:14:35 -0400 Received: from ncc1701.cistron.net ([62.216.30.38]:35202 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932224AbVIMFOf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:14:35 -0400 From: dth@cistron.nl (Danny ter Haar) Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm3 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Cistron Message-ID: References: <20050912024350.60e89eb1.akpm@osdl.org> <20050912200914.GA13962@kevlar.burdell.org> <20050912220617.GA18215@kevlar.burdell.org> X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1126588474 13647 62.216.30.70 (13 Sep 2005 05:14:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: dth@cistron.nl (Danny ter Haar) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 720 Lines: 17 Sonny Rao wrote: >Are you using jumbo frames or anything like that? Not as far as i know. I gave the kernel some more buffer as stated on http://home.cern.ch/~jes/gige/acenic.html echo 256144 > /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max echo 262144 > /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max >I can probably replicate order > 0 allocation failures pretty easily >using that, but I don't know if that's really the issue. I don't think that's the case , on this machine. Danny - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/