Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:16:18 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com>
To: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, klive@cpushare.com,
       Ian Wienand <ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: git tag in localversion
Message-ID: <20050913141618.GX13439@opteron.random>
References: <20050912210836.GL13439@opteron.random> <d120d5000509121431765f52c8@mail.gmail.com> <20050912222137.GP13439@opteron.random> <20050913083120.GG5276@mythryan2.michonline.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050913083120.GG5276@mythryan2.michonline.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1046
Lines: 26

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:31:27AM -0400, Ryan Anderson wrote:
> My suggestion would be to classify these wherever they would fall if the
> -gXXXXXXXX wasn't present, as they fall into the same category.

I was considering doing this last night.

OTOH if I do that, I should merge the -git(\d+) in the same category
too.

> They won't get as much testing, but if you see 5 or 10 of these in the
> same category and -rc range, that's a good indication that a few people
> are testing those kernels.

Right now I simply moved them from unknown to the mainline branch, but I
still leave them separated like the -git(\d+) tags.

I probably should change that and merge after removing hte -g and -git
tags (of course without discarding the tag but showing it after clicking
on the kernel release).

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/