Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964908AbVIMRCe (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:02:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964907AbVIMRCd (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:02:33 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:30383 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964905AbVIMRCc (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:02:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:01:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Al Viro cc: Sripathi Kodi , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patrics@interia.pl, Ingo Molnar , Roland McGrath Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads In-Reply-To: <20050913165102.GR25261@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <4325BEF3.2070901@in.ibm.com> <20050912134954.7bbd15b2.akpm@osdl.org> <4326CFE2.6000908@in.ibm.com> <20050913165102.GR25261@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 624 Lines: 17 On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Al Viro wrote: > > What we need is to decide what kind of access control do we really want on > /proc//task. That's it. I don't think any controls at all. The real control should then be on the /proc//task/ access, which should be the same as the /proc/ controls (except for thread rather than thread , of course) Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/