Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965037AbVINGQz (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:16:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965039AbVINGQy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:16:54 -0400 Received: from uucp.cistron.nl ([62.216.30.38]:39319 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965037AbVINGQy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:16:54 -0400 From: dth@cistron.nl (Danny ter Haar) Subject: Re: Q: why _less_ performance on machine with SMP then with UP kernel ? Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 06:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Cistron Message-ID: References: <200509132254.15158.andrew@walrond.org> X-Trace: ncc1701.cistron.net 1126678613 8215 62.216.30.70 (14 Sep 2005 06:16:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Originator: dth@cistron.nl (Danny ter Haar) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1775 Lines: 48 Andrew Walrond wrote: >> So what is the difference between UP & SMP ? >Is there any indication in the system log that your userland (news?) software >was having problems? Not really. The load of the machine doesn't get that high as normal. On machines that feed usenet to us (usenet ==push system) i see that we grow "backlog" (we're not accepting usenet as fast as we should). >It may be entirely unrelated to your problem, but you >should anyway be aware of a nasty unresolved issue with all smp kernels >= >2.6.12 on smp x86_64 systems: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4851 Now that you mention it, i saw this in the log file when running the SMP kernel: newsgate kernel: mv[7024]: segfault at 00002aaaaabc3648 rip 00002aaaaaaac80e rsp 00007fffffdc17c0 error 4 It was only a oneliner, no further details. >If you have any indication of userland problems, you might try > echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space >which much reduces (but seemingly does not completely remove) this issue for >most people. What i did try is the following (prior on other SMP kernels) I tried binding certain processes to a certain cpu. Did the same for the irq's. Just to see if it mattered. It didn't... >> A very confused >One of the major symptoms of this particular bug ;) I know, that's why a plee for help is _my_ only resort ;-) I do understand that at this level most people send in patches. Thanks for your reply! Will try the "echo 0" next time i boot a smp kernel. Danny - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/