Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 09:46:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 09:46:24 -0400 Received: from smtp017.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.114]:5906 "HELO smtp017.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 09:46:19 -0400 X-Apparently-From: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Matthew Gardiner To: Hans Reiser , Joshua Schmidlkofer Subject: Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 01:45:00 +1200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: kernel In-Reply-To: <0107270818120A.06707@widmers.oce.srci.oce.int> <3B6180CD.9D68CC07@namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <3B6180CD.9D68CC07@namesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01072901450000.02683@kiwiunixman.nodomain.nowhere> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Saturday 28 July 2001 02:55, Hans Reiser wrote: > Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: > > I've almost quit using reiser, because everytime I have a power outage, > > the last 2 or three files that I've editted, even ones that I haven't > > touched in a while, will usually be hopelessly corrupted. The '~' > > that Emacs makes is usually fine though. It seems to be that any open > > file is in danger. I don't know if this is normal, or not, but I > > switched to XFS on several machines. I have nothing against reiser. I > > assumed that these problems were due to immaturity.... > > > > One more thing - All my computers with Reiser as '/' on them had a > > disturbingly long boot time. From the time when the Redhat startup > > scripts began, it was.... hideously slow. I thought nothing of it, > > blaming bash, > > Don't use RedHat with ReiserFS, they screw things up so many ways..... > > For instance, they compile it with the wrong options set, their boot > scripts are wrong, they just shovel software onto the CD. > > Use SuSE, and trust me, ReiserFS will boot faster than ext2. > > Actually, I am curious as to exactly how they manage to make ReiserFS boot > longer than ext2. Do they run fsck or what? > > Hans Regards to the ReiserFS. Something more spookie, OpenLinux (no boos and hisses please ;) ), they have ReiserFS as a module, yet, when I have the root partition as reiser I have no problems, voo doo magic perhaps? because when I compiled 2.4.7 w/ ReiserFS as a module, the boot forks up. Regarding the last comment, I think Redhat and Caldera have debugging enable (God knows why?), well, Caldera definately dones, after having a look at their default kernel configuration, hence, when I recompiled my kernel to 2.4.7, threw the reiserFS into the guts of the kernel with debugging turned off, there was a speed increase. Also, to speed it up, I have heard a urban myth (I am not too sure whether it is true), you add the tag notail. A little more disk space is used, however, apparently, it is meant to speed up access. Matthew Gardiner -- WARNING: This email was written on an OS using the viral 'GPL' as its license. Please check with Bill Gates before continuing to read this email/posting. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/