Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:09:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:09:46 -0400 Received: from [209.226.93.226] ([209.226.93.226]:33778 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:09:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 10:08:05 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: Hans Reiser , Alan Cox cc: "A. Lehmann" <"pcg( Marc)"@goof.com>, Joshua Schmidlkofer , kernel Subject: Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption Message-ID: <114580000.996329285@tiny> In-Reply-To: <3B626B81.49E25A39@namesys.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Saturday, July 28, 2001 11:36:33 AM +0400 Hans Reiser wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: >> >> No doubt if Namesys ran test suites all the tail merging bug fiasco and the >> directory/tree balance races wouldnt have happened. > Our test suites need much improvement, but we do have them and use them. > Can you say the same? He's already described some of the testing they do. I would suggest there are better ways to use l-k bandwidth than picking a fight with redhat, especially on topics that have already been beaten to death. Alan, thanks for helping to test the reiserfs patches we've been sending to in the ac tree, we do appreciate it. -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/