From: Daniel Goller <morfic@gentoo.org>
To: ncunningham@cyclades.com
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] swsusp3: push image reading/writing into userspace
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:13:02 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <20050914223206.GA2376@elf.ucw.cz> <1126749596.3987.5.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1126749596.3987.5.camel@localhost>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200509142113.03763.morfic@gentoo.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1338
Lines: 35

On Wednesday 14 September 2005 08:59 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Pavel.
>
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 08:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Here's prototype code for swsusp3. It seems to work for me, but don't
> > try it... yet. Code is very ugly at places, sorry, I know and will fix
> > it. This is just proof that it can be done, and that it can be done
> > without excessive ammount of code.
>
> No comments on the code sorry. Instead I want to ask, could you please
> find a different name? swsusp3 is going to make people think that it's
> Suspend2 redesigned. Since there hasn't been a swsusp2 (so far as I
> know), 

swsusp2 seems to be the common/trivial name for suspend2 (at least while 
struggling to get any kind of suspend working here, helpful people have 
refered to suspend2 as swsusp2)

> how about using that name instead? At least then we'll clearly 
> differentiate the two implementations and you won't confuse/irritate
> users.

if he would use that people would get quite confused and not know if people 
mean your suspend2 or his swsusp2

Just a thought,

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/