Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 15:03:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 15:03:01 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:36358 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 15:02:49 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 16:02:47 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Alan Cox , Matthew Gardiner , "Philip R. Auld" , kernel Subject: Re: binary modules (was Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption) In-Reply-To: <3B62E80A.C732C3F5@mandrakesoft.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > The Linux freevxfs module is read only currently. Veritas apparently will be > > releasing the genuine article for Linux but binary only with all the mess > > that entails > > Isn't that a violation of the GPL, to release binary modules? Binary modules using only the interfaces exported in /proc/ksyms are, under certain readings of the GPL, no less "infected" by the GPL than binary programs making system calls. This means binary only modules are ok, as long as they don't need changes in the kernel to work. regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/