Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030407AbVIOEkc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:40:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030409AbVIOEkc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:40:32 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.192]:11175 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030407AbVIOEka convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:40:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BMVpUIEbkvI1uyL0IQ06djIGVhbrHrp69V2fyoJP86i1zDtpoz8jdVZqV8T1xx6xMCwVzQn/mxft7lF65TUYm6qRYXuvXRJaRkT4cHK1jmOcd0zwnQNkb0uk0W1bq7cKxTtbfGR/uMH+ojw9kyriD15i5+6gvHCdjeYkkTv87Kk= Message-ID: <355e5e5e050914214025feee82@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:40:27 -0400 From: Lukasz Kosewski Reply-To: lkosewsk@gmail.com To: jim.ramsay@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add disk hotswap support to libata RESEND #2 Cc: Stefan Richter , Jeff Garzik , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4789af9e05090612023fb8517c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <355e5e5e05080103021a8239df@mail.gmail.com> <4789af9e050823124140eb924f@mail.gmail.com> <4789af9e050823154364c8e9eb@mail.gmail.com> <430BA990.9090807@mvista.com> <430BCB41.5070206@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <355e5e5e05082407031138120a@mail.gmail.com> <4789af9e05082408111c4a6294@mail.gmail.com> <4789af9e05082409121cc6870@mail.gmail.com> <4789af9e0508291223435f174@mail.gmail.com> <4789af9e05090612023fb8517c@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 18 On 9/6/05, Jim Ramsay wrote: > However, I have seen the occasion where a single IRQ is used to signal > both a DMA completion AND a hotplug event. Of course in this case the > hotplug event itself would be ignored completely. > > So I would recommend getting rid of that check entirely. Hey Jim, Not that I disbelieve you, but do you have an example of a controller where this happens? I've done a lot of testing and never seen this... Luke Kosewski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/