Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965221AbVIOEyh (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:54:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030355AbVIOEye (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:54:34 -0400 Received: from smtp202.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([216.136.129.92]:24755 "HELO smtp202.mail.sc5.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965039AbVIOEyc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:54:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=CU2sHWRsda8HQJ9z9o5nI2hmvVQd5JUEmNDQHqi/4Do/M9PoTXDBALwtb3lTBqnmxangmCSvEujqfGaeCmBLFUpHARXtpaMGwutAmCGUt92POj5kbNAmUqV3fbxBbBBQy8wsIDwp1jkkKWJsbKOagP0dipnbPgxFFKuAW6D7Brs= ; From: Marek W Reply-To: marekw1977@yahoo.com.au To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Automatic Configuration of a Kernel Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:18:13 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20050914223836.53814.qmail@web51011.mail.yahoo.com> <1126753444.13893.123.camel@mindpipe> In-Reply-To: <1126753444.13893.123.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509151418.13927.marekw1977@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1566 Lines: 36 On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:04, Lee Revell wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 19:03 -0700, David Lang wrote: > > another advantage of having an auto-config for the kernel is that people > > who are experimenting may have the auto-config find hardware that they > > didn't realize they had (or they didn't realize that support had been > > added) > > > > I know that most of my kernels don't have support for everything the > > motherboards have on them (mostly I don't care much about the other > > features, but in some cases they weren't supported, or weren't worth the > > hassle of figureing the correct config for when I started, and I've never > > gone back to try and figure it out) > > Why does this have to be in the kernel again? Isn't this exactly what > you get with a fully modular config and hotplug? Not so much the kernel. When compiling the kernel I'd prefer not to waste time and space compiling the 100+ modules I will never ever use on my laptop. I'd prefer for something to select the modules necessary for my hardware. I can't afford the time to keep up to date with that's new and what isn't, what has changed, what has been superseded, which module works with which device, chipset even, etc... -- - Marek W -- 2b | !2b Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/