Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 20:04:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 20:04:10 -0400 Received: from schiele.swm.uni-mannheim.de ([134.155.20.124]:53384 "EHLO schiele.swm.uni-mannheim.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 20:03:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 02:03:44 +0200 From: Robert Schiele To: Philip Blundell Cc: Steven Cole , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.8-pre1 build error in drivers/parport/parport_pc.c Message-ID: <20010729020344.A9303@schiele.swm.uni-mannheim.de> In-Reply-To: <01072619531103.06728@localhost.localdomain> <20010727101241.A15014@schiele.swm.uni-mannheim.de> <20010728222943.A24586@schiele.swm.uni-mannheim.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i In-Reply-To: ; from philb@gnu.org on Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 10:06:43PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > >The "extern" was only an escape for the case that the compiler cannot > >inline the function. Due to the fact, that current gcc has "static > >inline" it is better to use this, because with "static inline" we do > >not need to keep a global symbol just for the case the compiler is not > >capable to inline the function in some place. >=20 > The versions in the .c file are there so that the "ops" structure can poi= nt to=20 > them. The ones in the .h file are purely an optimisation to allow you to= =20 > short-circuit the ops struct if you know only one driver is involved. Because of that the compiler has to create a "real" function from the code anyway. The way this is handled by gcc is stated in the gcc info pages: "When a function is both inline and `static', if all calls to the function are integrated into the caller, and the function's address is never used, then the function's own assembler code is never referenced. In this case, GNU CC does not actually output assembler code for the function, unless you specify the option `-fkeep-inline-functions'. Some calls cannot be integrated for various reasons (in particular, calls that precede the function's definition cannot be integrated, and neither can recursive calls within the definition). If there is a nonintegrated call, then the function is compiled to assembler code as usual. The function must also be compiled as usual if the program refers to its address, because that can't be inlined." >=20 > Changing this stuff to "static inline" still offends my sense of aestheti= cs=20 > somewhat, but I guess it's okay if you have checked that it still does th= e=20 > right thing in the CONFIG_PARPORT_OTHER case. I didn't test this before your mail. But to be absolutely sure, I tested it now. --- And it works perfectly. Robert --=20 Robert Schiele mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de Tel./Fax: +49-621-10059 http://webrum.uni-mannheim.de/math/rschiele/ --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQEVAwUBO2NS38QAnns5HcHpAQEZqwf7BoLS24W1wfLUGR5LEnUvq1X7e0KTVzrD bYZML/s5N6E9fVWYGV+6UaBo2XyfHlMXiRAvdvOwtxvj5qTs3IYjUZ9bKWW320ab ctSS/snsvb9M2YB0oqCZyxc0SNOjeWXmxL/bF2D6yQZiWUQR41/8vBgSwKVEVqtb sK+SpF8ojf2FC5Rdb+kMSJQ2wSG7SPRQ+EUZzTAldDLxM4d8vpnv9TiAiq5Ucn1+ 5S3kb9GWHR/4qNFQOh862Tw5ORJMvloQLxe5TQN49UFKhhX1AKrNzlKUYn9WycSW xLGdXl06GXmRvHe/tHRt88N1G1TrsTKMmXV5ighE8Kodpk2B6RIAWw== =4kCf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/