Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965278AbVIOTwj (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:52:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965279AbVIOTwj (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:52:39 -0400 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.203]:33882 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965278AbVIOTwi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:52:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CKEsAk38pdSSKXao3OAqBuEvuOpV3/weAtt+JIy3NzJkQhqC8dBl5rCoo3176Dn7ytbU/jKP3rx4efeQRVaKD1AdEh5CaS5RNiD9E/jUkVoPKE/bjdThLFzGUbpXqavytCVEEiG/yg6cbQ9mtlnAuAlpBmUCk8cbppk2rHVU6C0= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:52:30 -0500 From: Dmitry Torokhov Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [patch 09/28] Input: convert net/bluetooth to dynamic input_dev allocation Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , Marcel Holtmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Kay Sievers , Hannes Reinecke In-Reply-To: <20050915193143.GA7199@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050915070131.813650000.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <20050915070302.931769000.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <1126770894.28510.10.camel@station6.example.com> <1126795310.3505.47.camel@station6.example.com> <20050915190700.GA3354@midnight.suse.cz> <20050915193143.GA7199@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 929 Lines: 23 On 9/15/05, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:22:34PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Anyway, I think if Greg gives up and agrees on nesting classes all of > > it can go in -mm for now and I will contact other maintainers to > > verify that changes work. IIRC video/dvb mainatiners prefered all > > changes to go through them. > > No, I don't agree with this. Give me a day to write up what I think we > should do instead (something along the lines of "subclasses") > Hmm.. nested class _is_ a subclass. It is just not a separate object structure (like you don't have sub-devices either). But I guess I better wait fro your write-up... -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/