Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161046AbVIPB6a (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:58:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161047AbVIPB6a (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:58:30 -0400 Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.99]:6309 "HELO smtp106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161046AbVIPB6a (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:58:30 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Kay Sievers Subject: Re: [RFC] subclasses in sysfs to solve world peace Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:58:23 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik , Hannes Reinecke , Patrick Mochel , airlied@linux.ie References: <20050916002036.GA6149@suse.de> <200509151958.45573.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <20050916014652.GA12920@vrfy.org> In-Reply-To: <20050916014652.GA12920@vrfy.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509152058.23759.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 657 Lines: 18 On Thursday 15 September 2005 20:46, Kay Sievers wrote: > > I would like to have the option to move "block" into "class" some day > and therefore prefer the "stacking class devices", compared to the "grouping > and symlinking" classes model. > The question is why can't we have both models? I agree that for block you want what Greg is proposing, for input and some other subsystems - not so much. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/