Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 07:10:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 07:10:06 -0400 Received: from weta.f00f.org ([203.167.249.89]:19846 "HELO weta.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 07:09:47 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:10:23 +1200 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Matthew Gardiner Cc: Alan Cox , "Philip R. Auld" , kernel Subject: Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption Message-ID: <20010729231023.C3917@weta.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <01072922150300.03891@kiwiunixman.nodomain.nowhere> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01072922150300.03891@kiwiunixman.nodomain.nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 10:15:03PM +1200, Matthew Gardiner wrote: tsk tsk tsk. A bit disappointing that Vertias has taken that approach. However, even still, reiserFS is pretty awsome. Extremely fast and space efficient, esp on a 60gig drive ;) Why "tsk tsk tsk" ? If reiserfs suits you, use it --- you need never go near VXFS. Personally, even though I use reiserfs, I am of the opinion that XFS, and VXFS and both superior, especially when you include volume management. Time will show whether or not these very well designed file-systems are suitable under Linux though, as reiserfs has a considerable head start. --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/