Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751162AbVIQRQm (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:16:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751164AbVIQRQl (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:16:41 -0400 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:4100 "EHLO khc.piap.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751162AbVIQRQl (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:16:41 -0400 To: Subject: Why don't we separate menuconfig from the kernel? From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: 17 Sep 2005 19:16:33 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 452 Lines: 9 Hi, A number of packages (e.g., busybox) use some, more or less broken, version of menuconfig. Would it make sense to move menuconfig to a separate well-defined package? Nooo? Why not? -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/