Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932381AbVISIqO (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:46:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932386AbVISIqO (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:46:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:56213 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932381AbVISIqN (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:46:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Heiko Carstens X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus Cc: Atsushi Nemoto , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, macro@linux-mips.org, akpm@osdl.org, dev@sw.ru, Martin Schwidefsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] more sigkill priority fix In-Reply-To: Heiko Carstens's message of Monday, 19 September 2005 10:24:23 +0200 <20050919082423.GB15034@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> X-Zippy-Says: .. I wonder if I ought to tell them about my PREVIOUS LIFE as a COMPLETE STRANGER? Message-Id: <20050919084607.0D50C180E1D@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 467 Lines: 14 > Is this the way the kernel is supposed to handle signals now? > Just wondering, since this changes signal handling quite significantly from > what it was before. It has always been the correct behavior. Thanks, Roland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/