Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964987AbVITM17 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:27:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964994AbVITM17 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:27:59 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.198]:38879 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964987AbVITM16 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:27:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eJ5zNGavZCn1VaARv7J54ZJaltPt26+XW1m06wGn+cuoVSyAkHi5H3xsgP8np8UzOoucYFfBTg5I8oMe3YtvU5/GRYdY70M1NwQyqIVCCR9xjAf/bOkH70BlvkVmGeVtMjtwlbl/O7z2SBwk2ugHcP/2jlVBfhcSrXFwn2bksfg= Message-ID: <9a87484905092005277f1bb470@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:27:54 +0200 From: Jesper Juhl Reply-To: jesper.juhl@gmail.com To: fawadlateef@gmail.com Subject: Re: regarding kernel compilation Cc: Denis Vlasenko , Gireesh Kumar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1e62d137050920013752bf31d7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <32854.192.168.9.246.1127197320.squirrel@192.168.9.246> <1e62d13705092000112a49cb6c@mail.gmail.com> <200509201112.28091.vda@ilport.com.ua> <1e62d137050920013752bf31d7@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1593 Lines: 37 On 9/20/05, Fawad Lateef wrote: > On 9/20/05, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 10:11, Fawad Lateef wrote: > > > I don't think you will be able to compile 2.4 kernel on to the 2.6 > > > kernel based distro .... as in 2.6 based distro, mod-utils and other > > > > 2.6 modutils (module-init-tools to be exact) fall back to .old > > (by just exec'ing it) if those exist. > > > > you are right, but if they exists .... but what IIRC I havn't found > them on FC4/RH EL4 distributions ..... > Slackware 10.0, 10.1 and 10.2 run just fine with 2.4.x and 2.6.x kernels and you can build, install and run both just fine - no problems at all there (even Slackware 9.1 will work with a few small changes). > > > packages are updated and will only support 2.6 based kernel .... So > > > > Not true. I compiled 2.4 kernels on 2.6 machine without any problems. > > > On which distribution 2.6 based you compiled and succesfully run 2.4 > kernel ??? b/c its not working on FC3/FC4/AS4 ......... > Those are just a small subset of available distributions. Just because it won't work there doesn't mean much. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/