Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751410AbVIUTq0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:46:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751411AbVIUTqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:46:25 -0400 Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:54287 "EHLO linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751410AbVIUTqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:46:25 -0400 From: Nick Warne To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: A pettiness question. Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:46:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509212046.15793.nick@linicks.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 876 Lines: 28 >> This give a enum of {0,1}. If test is not 0, !!test will give 1, >> otherwise 0. >> >> Am I right? > > Yes. I think of it as a "truth value" predicate (or operator). Interesting. I thought maybe this way was trick, until later I experimented. My post here (as Bill Stokes): http://www.quakesrc.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5626 So what is the reason to doing !!num as opposed to num ? 1:0 (which is more readable I think, especially to a lesser experienced C coder). Quicker to type? My quick test shows compiler renders both the same? Nick -- "When you're chewing on life's gristle, Don't grumble, Give a whistle..." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/