Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965208AbVIVBpT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:45:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965207AbVIVBpT (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:45:19 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:3722 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965205AbVIVBpS (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:45:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:44:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter To: "David S. Miller" cc: dada1@cosmosbay.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance In-Reply-To: <20050921.173408.122945960.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: References: <43308324.70403@cosmosbay.com> <4331CFA7.50104@cosmosbay.com> <20050921.173408.122945960.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 705 Lines: 21 On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Christoph Lameter > Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:43:29 -0700 (PDT) > > > Maybe we better introduce vmalloc_node() instead of improvising this for > > several subsystems? The e1000 driver has similar issues. > > I agree. I did an implementation in June. See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=111766643127530&w=2 Not sure if this will fit the bill. Never really tested it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/