Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030343AbVIVNvt (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:51:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030344AbVIVNvs (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:51:48 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:15010 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030343AbVIVNvs (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:51:48 -0400 Subject: Re: SATA suspend-to-ram patch - merge? From: Alan Cox To: Jens Axboe Cc: Jeff Garzik , Joshua Kwan , Linux Kernel , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20050922061849.GJ7929@suse.de> References: <433104E0.4090308@triplehelix.org> <433221A1.5000600@pobox.com> <20050922061849.GJ7929@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:17:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1127398679.18840.84.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 846 Lines: 21 On Iau, 2005-09-22 at 08:18 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > So currently we are in limbo... > > Which is a shame, since it means that software suspend on sata is > basically impossible :) Not really, everyone on the planet who cares is using the existing patch and that just works. If the SCSI folks can't fix the SCSI layer to do power management then the scsi drivers just need to not provide pm methods until they catch up. Blocking SATA suspend which people need for SCSI suspend which is utterly obscure and weird is pointless, as pretty much ever vendor except Red Hat has already decided. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/