Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750850AbVIWRmy (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:42:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750849AbVIWRmy (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:42:54 -0400 Received: from mail.tmr.com ([64.65.253.246]:21139 "EHLO gaimboi.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750848AbVIWRmy (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:42:54 -0400 Message-ID: <43343EBE.2070101@tmr.com> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:43:26 -0400 From: Bill Davidsen Organization: TMR Associates Inc, Schenectady NY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050729 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nishanth Aravamudan CC: sean.bruno@dsl-only.net, ak@suse.de, LKML Subject: Re: The system works (2.6.14-rc2): functional k8n-dl References: <20050922155254.GE5910@us.ibm.com> <433303A9.6050909@tmr.com> <20050923171514.GF5910@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20050923171514.GF5910@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1600 Lines: 50 Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: >On 22.09.2005 [15:19:05 -0400], Bill Davidsen wrote: > > >>Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: >> >> >>>Hello all, >>> >>> > > > > > >>>code in such a solid state. I have had only one complaint so far: it >>>seems that the the "Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751 Gigabit >>>Ethernet PCI Express" adapter, with the tg3 driver, downs and ups the >>>iface on MTU changes. Unfortunately, with some VPN software I use, it is >>>sometimes necessary to drop the MTU to 1300 or so to get consistent >>>connections. When I do this, though, ssh through the tunnel tends to not >>>function. I have a workaround, where I bounce over a different laptop, >>>but that's a bit of a pain (and that network adapter seems to be able to >>>transiently change the MTU). Not a big deal, in any case. >>> >>> >>You can (or could in 2.4) sometimes play with the size for an individual >>IP by using the "mss" option of the old "route" command. That shouldn't >>glitch anything, it just should use little packets. >> >> > >Yes, I see that still being an option. Let me go learn how to use route >and see if that works better. > > route gw mss 1200 -- bill davidsen CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/