Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750929AbVIWRz0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:55:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750931AbVIWRz0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:55:26 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:39848 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750925AbVIWRz0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:55:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:55:25 -0700 From: Nishanth Aravamudan To: Bill Davidsen Cc: sean.bruno@dsl-only.net, ak@suse.de, LKML Subject: Re: The system works (2.6.14-rc2): functional k8n-dl Message-ID: <20050923175525.GL5910@us.ibm.com> References: <20050922155254.GE5910@us.ibm.com> <433303A9.6050909@tmr.com> <20050923171514.GF5910@us.ibm.com> <43343EBE.2070101@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43343EBE.2070101@tmr.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.14-rc2 (x86_64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1919 Lines: 53 On 23.09.2005 [13:43:26 -0400], Bill Davidsen wrote: > Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > >On 22.09.2005 [15:19:05 -0400], Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > > > >>Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hello all, > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>code in such a solid state. I have had only one complaint so far: it > >>>seems that the the "Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751 Gigabit > >>>Ethernet PCI Express" adapter, with the tg3 driver, downs and ups the > >>>iface on MTU changes. Unfortunately, with some VPN software I use, it is > >>>sometimes necessary to drop the MTU to 1300 or so to get consistent > >>>connections. When I do this, though, ssh through the tunnel tends to not > >>>function. I have a workaround, where I bounce over a different laptop, > >>>but that's a bit of a pain (and that network adapter seems to be able to > >>>transiently change the MTU). Not a big deal, in any case. > >>> > >>> > >>You can (or could in 2.4) sometimes play with the size for an individual > >>IP by using the "mss" option of the old "route" command. That shouldn't > >>glitch anything, it just should use little packets. > >> > >> > > > >Yes, I see that still being an option. Let me go learn how to use route > >and see if that works better. > > > > > > route gw mss 1200 Thanks, that works for setting the mss, but when setting it to 1200, i can't even ping the remote host. I can ping it if remove the mss change. I can even ssh to it. It just so happens that when I try to ls a large directory, the connection tends to hang. Any other ideas? Or tracing I can do to figure it out? -Nish - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/