Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:56:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:56:48 -0400 Received: from gateway.wvi.com ([204.119.27.10]:10935 "HELO gateway.wvi.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:56:43 -0400 Message-ID: <3B659FDB.CCBECA4C@wvi.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 10:56:43 -0700 From: Jim Potter X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Test mail In-Reply-To: <200107301722.f6UHM3A205344@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing One problem with the idea of banning "MS virus express" is that most of the lemmings stuck with MS's windows are also stuck with the MS's mail app. If they had the wherewithall (personal, political, whatever) to switch to a different mail app, they'de probably know how & be able to switch the whole thing to a better environment. > >> Would it not be simple and effective to filter out mail produced by > >> Outlook? > >> It sounds to me the equivalent of RBL & co. > >> RBL filter out mail from open relay used to spam us. > >> NoOutlook filter out mail from poor software/OS used to propagate viruses. > >> > >> I guess that 100% of incomming viruses in lkml come from a Outlook mailer. > >> And for the last two ones I'm sure. > >> > >> Christophe > > > > Um, that's just a little (LITTLE?!?) draconian/elitist. How about > > putting in a handler that renames EXEs attachments and EXEs in > > compressed files to something a little less executable? > > > > Don't get me wrong. I'm no fan of Outlook or OE, but you > > can't just step on people who use them. > > This is a lot less draconian/elitist than banning ISPs. People > seldom have a choice between multiple ISPs that offer affordable > high-speed connections. Consider yourself lucky if both DSL and > cable modem service are available and affordable in your area. > > Banning Outlook isn't so bad. Assuming you are stuck with Windows, > you still have many choices. Netscape/Mozilla and Eudora would be > the obvious choices. I think you can get pine. Emacs has been > ported to Windows, so you have the rmail/gnus stuff. Surely you > can tolerate at least one of these many choices. -- Sincerely, Jim Potter 45th Parallel Processing jrp@wvi.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/