Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:54:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:54:04 -0400 Received: from mta1n.bluewin.ch ([195.186.1.210]:54426 "EHLO mta1n.bluewin.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:53:49 -0400 Message-ID: <3B4B4FC10065D2C3@mta1n.bluewin.ch> (added by postmaster@bluewin.ch) From: "Per Jessen" To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:59:55 +0200 Reply-To: "Per Jessen" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 95 (4.0.1111) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Test mail Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing >On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 15:19:17 -0400 (EDT), Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > >Torrey Hoffman writes: > >> I hate to jump in and extend this mostly off-topic thread, but I would be >> a little annoyed if Outlook was banned from LKML. I've got two machines >> on my desk here at work - one is Win2K, and is used almost exclusively for >> Outlook and Word. It's very difficult to give those up when the rest of >> the company uses them extensively. The automatic meeting scheduling and >> other MS Exchange features of Outlook are not available in other clients, >> and why should I switch when Outlook works fine? Completely agree. I am in the exact same situation. I need/want to follow Linux development, but my corporate desktop is MS, Outlook etc. What's wrong with that ? (my development systems are not connected to anything else but our internal network.) >> Of course the other computer runs Linux, and is where all my real work >> gets done. It's convenient to have both environments. > >This does not mean you have to use Outlook to _send_ mail to >the linux-kernel mailing list. Do this: > >1. log into the Linux box you have >2. run emacs >3. Control-x m >4. fill in the header fields and write your message >5. Control-c Control-c Bollocks. Look, the main target here is practicality, and what you just demonstrated was plainly impractical. >If you really must send mail directly from the Windows box, >get emacs for Windows and skip step 1 above. This is an awful lot of effort just to overcome some peoples failure to avoid double-clicking on attachments in Outlook. > >BTW, if you can't log into anything that can open an SMTP connection >to the outside world and don't have a relay, then most likely your >employer doesn't want you sending stuff to linux-kernel anyway. Disagree. See above and join life in the real world. regards, Per Jessen, Zurich. regards, Per Jessen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/