Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932415AbVIZHAT (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2005 03:00:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932417AbVIZHAT (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2005 03:00:19 -0400 Received: from idefix.CeNTIE.NET.au ([202.9.6.83]:16260 "HELO idefix") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932415AbVIZHAS (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2005 03:00:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Suspend to RAM broken with 2.6.13 From: Jean-Marc Valin To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20050923163200.GC8946@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <1127347633.25357.49.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> <20050923163200.GC8946@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E9?= de Sherbrooke Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:59:57 +1000 Message-Id: <1127717997.16318.2.camel@142.163.233.220.exetel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 932 Lines: 19 > > I'm experiencing problems with suspend to RAM on my Dell D600 laptop. > > When I run Ubuntu's 2.6.10 kernel I have no problem with suspend to RAM. > > However, when I run 2.6.13, my laptop sometimes doesn't wake up. It > > seems like the longer my uptime, the more likely the problem is to occur > > (which makes it hard to reproduce sometimes). This happens even with a > > non-preempt kernel. > > Check if it works with minimal drivers and non-preemptible kernel... OK, I can confirm failure to resume even on a non-preempt 2.6.13 with no USB devices and lots of stuff (e.g. wifi card) turned off. So far, 2.6.10 is resuming (running a non-Ubuntu vanilla 2.6.10 now). Jean-Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/