Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932265AbVIZPUB (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:20:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932298AbVIZPUB (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:20:01 -0400 Received: from S01060013109fe3d4.vc.shawcable.net ([24.85.133.133]:56466 "EHLO montezuma.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932265AbVIZPUA (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:20:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:25:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo To: "Protasevich, Natalie" cc: Linux Kernel , Andi Kleen , "Nakajima, Jun" , "Raj, Ashok" , bjorn.helgaas@hp.com, Arjan van de Ven Subject: RE: [RFT][PATCH] i386 per cpu IDT (2.6.12-rc1-mm1) In-Reply-To: <19D0D50E9B1D0A40A9F0323DBFA04ACCE04D5D@USRV-EXCH4.na.uis.unisys.com> Message-ID: References: <19D0D50E9B1D0A40A9F0323DBFA04ACCE04D5D@USRV-EXCH4.na.uis.unisys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 19 On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Protasevich, Natalie wrote: > Great news, thanks! I will start testing it, pretty sure I can arrange > MSI devices, too. > As for your comment about vector allocation policy - allocation on the > node where device resides does sound logical to me... Thanks for checking it out Natalie, i think the concern there would be nodes registered as such to Linux with no processors online at initial insertion but having devices on the node busses. Thanks, Zwane - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/