Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964844AbVI0HUE (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 03:20:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964847AbVI0HUB (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 03:20:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:6607 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964845AbVI0HUA (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 03:20:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:28:25 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Kay Sievers , Vojtech Pavlik , Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [patch 02/28] I2O: remove i2o_device_class Message-ID: <20050927002825.GA11826@suse.de> References: <20050915070131.813650000.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <20050915070302.068231000.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050915070302.068231000.dtor_core@ameritech.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 613 Lines: 17 On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:01:33AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > I2O: cleanup - remove i2o_device_class > > I2O devices reside on their own bus so there should be no reason > to also have i2c_device class that mirros i2o bus. Ok, nice, this is good. But it doesn't apply at all, somethings odd. What tree is this diffed against, Linus's or -mm? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/