Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965039AbVI0SiJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:38:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965041AbVI0SiI (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:38:08 -0400 Received: from mail-kan.bigfish.com ([63.161.60.29]:9055 "EHLO mail10-kan-R.bigfish.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965039AbVI0SiH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:38:07 -0400 X-BigFish: V Message-ID: <4339918C.2040405@am.sony.com> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:38:04 -0700 From: Tim Bird User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel CC: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Christopher Friesen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, george@mvista.com, johnstul@us.ibm.com, paulmck@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ktimers subsystem References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 946 Lines: 25 Roman Zippel wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>Can you please point out which architectures do not have a 32x32->64 >>instruction ? > For the rest you might want to check , if div64 has to be > emulated, there are good chances this instruction has to be emulated as > well (especially in smaller embedded archs). Hmmm. In my experience, there are several embedded platforms with a 32x32->64 instruction, which are lacking a div64 instruction. I don't think checking for div64 is a very good metric here. ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Electronics ============================= - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/