Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751171AbVI1DrB (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:47:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751177AbVI1DrA (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:47:00 -0400 Received: from newpeace.netnation.com ([204.174.223.7]:27558 "EHLO peace.netnation.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751171AbVI1DrA (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:47:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:47:00 -0700 From: Simon Kirby To: Philippe Troin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Strangeness with signals Message-ID: <20050928034659.GA27953@netnation.com> References: <20050927232034.GC6833@netnation.com> <87hdc6htur.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87hdc6htur.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 849 Lines: 18 On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:19:24PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote: > The SIGWINCH and SIGCHLD signals are not generated if their > disposition is set to SIG_DFL. I believe SIGCONT and SIGURG also > behave similarly. If you want to see them from your application, you > have to establish a (potentially empty) signal handler. Ok, and this is what I did in the example; however, is it expected that it does not help to set a handler in sa_handler and call sigaction()? In fact, it does not matter what sa_handler is set to (it can still be SIG_IGN), but sa_sigaction must point to a valid handler. Simon- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/