Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965268AbVI1IhF (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:37:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965267AbVI1IhE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:37:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:47341 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965062AbVI1IhC (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:37:02 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Harald Welte Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:37:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Henrik Nordstrom , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <432EF0C5.5090908@cosmosbay.com> <20050928083240.GP4168@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> In-Reply-To: <20050928083240.GP4168@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509281037.03185.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1330 Lines: 31 On Wednesday 28 September 2005 10:32, Harald Welte wrote: > I totally agree, that from a current perspective, I think the concept of > just loading a module (that has usage count 0) having severe impact on > system performance is just wrong. But then, users are used to the > current behaviour for almost five years now. That doesn't mean it cannot be improved - and I think it should. In a sense it's even getting worse: For example us losing the CONFIG option to disable local conntrack (Patrick has disabled it some time ago without even a comment why he did it) has a really bad impact in some cases. > Therefore: Let's do this right next time, but live with that fact for > now. Even with a "quite straight-forward" (quoting you) fix? > Just imagine all those poor sysadmins who know nothing about current > kernel development, and who upgrade their kernel because their > distributor provides a new one - suddenly their accounting (which might > be relevant for their business) doesn't work anymore :( Accounting with per CPU counters can be done fully lockless. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/