Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750772AbVI1U4n (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:56:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750809AbVI1U4n (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:56:43 -0400 Received: from pimout5-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.73]:28047 "EHLO pimout5-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750772AbVI1U4m (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:56:42 -0400 X-ORBL: [69.107.75.50] DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=sbc01; d=pacbell.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:subject:cc:references:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=sAJ2TmhGb9OLhFZrtQdCle+pW5dvxIH8wOp986V0oY7vNVM8t9MNoBaDGyZw/1byK jbOk+tJcYJH2PQo6YKNFQ== Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:56:09 -0700 From: David Brownell To: rjw@sisk.pl Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.6.13-mm2 Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com, daniel.ritz@gmx.ch, akpm@osdl.org References: <20050908053042.6e05882f.akpm@osdl.org> <200509282205.49316.daniel.ritz@gmx.ch> <20050928202314.54672E3723@adsl-69-107-32-110.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <200509282237.12750.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200509282237.12750.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050928205609.77623E371B@adsl-69-107-32-110.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1233 Lines: 32 > On Wednesday, 28 of September 2005 22:23, David Brownell wrote: > > > > > > BTW, please have a look at: > > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4416#c36 > > > > > > and > > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4416#c37 > > > > What's with the bogus dates in those reports ... claiming some of you > > were testing 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 more than two months ago, mid-July ????? > > Nothing. :-) 2.6.13-rc2-mm2 was out exactly on July 12, and that's when > I tested it ... OK, sorry; pardon me! Then the right question to ask is more like "So does this still happen in **2.6.14-rc2** ??". 2.6.13-rc is marginally more recent than 2.4.20, but it still feels old. :) My other point still stands though. The IRQ for all HCDs _are_ freed on suspend, and re-requested on resume ... so lack of such free/request calls can't possibly be an issue. The old rule of thumb with USB does still apply though: be sure to test with BIOS support for it disabled. - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/