Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751111AbVI1WHa (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:07:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750951AbVI1WHa (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:07:30 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:13525 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751111AbVI1WHa (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:07:30 -0400 X-Authenticated: #2813124 From: Daniel Ritz To: David Brownell Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.6.13-mm2 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:07:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com, akpm@osdl.org References: <20050908053042.6e05882f.akpm@osdl.org> <200509282245.30410.daniel.ritz@gmx.ch> <20050928210717.5CF71E372B@adsl-69-107-32-110.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <20050928210717.5CF71E372B@adsl-69-107-32-110.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509290007.33686.daniel.ritz@gmx.ch> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2246 Lines: 56 On Wednesday 28 September 2005 23.07, David Brownell wrote: > > > > ok. i didn't look too close, but i think ohci-hcd does not fully disable > > > > interrupts in it's suspend callback...needs a closer look. > > > > cc:ing linux-usb-devel... > > > > > > It's handled in hcd-pci.c ... All PCI based HCDs release their IRQs > > > when they suspend. Including OHCI. Your diagnosis is incorrect. > > > > would you be kind enough to tell me where? > > There's only one free_irq() line, and it gets called the first time > through usb_hcd_pci_suspend(). QED. errm yes. that's the one my test patch commented out. but that was really not what i was asking/telling. so again: to me it looks like ohci-hcd does not fully disable interrupts on suspend. disable (read: tell the hardware not to generate interrupts anymore), not releasing the handler. > > > > my point is: the test patch i sent to rafael which comments out the > > free_irq-on-suspend thing in hcd-pci.c shows that something is wrong with > > USB (i think only OHCI. UHCI looks ok and about EHCI i have no data). > > Your logic escapes me, since your patch affected all three PCI HCDs. > If that's wrong for one, its wrong for all three. to me it seems there is code in uhci-hcd that tells the hardware not to generate interrupts anymore. for ohci i think this is missing and for ehci i simply didn't bother to check at all. > > And as I just commented to Rafael, here are two better things to try > instead of believing a diagnosis that's clearly wrong: > > - 2.6.14-rc2 > - disabling USB keyboard/mouse/... support in your BIOS > > I know there are bugs in the "usb-handoff" PCI quirk code; the folk who've > collected those code fragments didn't bother to match the code in the HCDs, > and the differences can matter [1]. The best way to avoid such stuff is > still to make sure that your BIOS just ignores USB. > > - Dave > > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=112745488924651&w=2 > > rgds -daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/