Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 02:13:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 02:13:33 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:19361 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 31 Jul 2001 02:13:22 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15206.19567.477213.727922@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:13:03 -0700 (PDT) To: Sridhar Samudrala Cc: jamal , diffserv-general@lists.sourceforge.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, thiemo@sics.se, Renu Tewari , dmfreim@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [Linux Diffserv] Re: [PATCH] Inbound Connection Control mechanism: Prioritized Accept Queue In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing Sridhar Samudrala writes: > oss.software.ibm.com is running linux 2.2.19. I guess linux should by > default ignore ECN bits if it is not enabled. Do you think this ECN problem > has something to do with the server or some router on the way the server? As Jamal and Jeff have mentioned, it's not a Linux problem. Rather it's the buggy firewall products IBM is using. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/