Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932457AbVI3AsE (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:48:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932471AbVI3AsE (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:48:04 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:48069 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932457AbVI3AsC (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:48:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:48:00 -0500 To: paulus@samba.org Cc: linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/7] ppc64: Assorted minor EEH cleanups Message-ID: <20050930004800.GL29826@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: linas Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1070 Lines: 23 The following seven patches perform a variety of cleanups and restructurings of the EEH code, in preparation for the addition of code that will recover from EEH events. The frst few patches are nearly janitorial, mostly tweaking whitespace; alhough the later patches are more serious and actually fix bugs. These are all small, and should be easy to review. I beleive that these patches should not be controversial in any way, and thus should be ready to be applied. They compile but (ahem) are not tested, as I just now discovered that I cannot even boot 2.6.14-rc2-git6 in any shape or form; it panics complaining of "junk in gzipped archive". Of course, I am of the firmest conviction that my patches are spotless, and need no testing, anyway. So there. :) Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas --linas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/