Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750858AbVJAV2W (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:28:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750859AbVJAV2W (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:28:22 -0400 Received: from smtpout5.uol.com.br ([200.221.4.196]:54233 "EHLO smtp.uol.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750856AbVJAV2V (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 17:28:21 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:28:06 -0300 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog=E9rio?= Brito To: Lennart Sorensen Cc: Grant Coady , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Strange disk corruption with Linux >= 2.6.13 Message-ID: <20051001212806.GD6397@ime.usp.br> Mail-Followup-To: Lennart Sorensen , Grant Coady , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050927111038.GA22172@ime.usp.br> <9ncij11fqb4l70qrhb0a8nri5moohnkaaf@4ax.com> <20050927140434.GL28578@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050927140434.GL28578@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1651 Lines: 39 On Sep 27 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > The board is allowed 1.5GB using 3 x 512M. I believe the 512M modules > must be double sided to work but I am not 100% sure of that. Right now, I'm using just a single 512MB module, but it is single-sided (I guess that by double-sided you guys mean that it has chips on both sides of the module, right?). The only double-sided module that I have here is the 256MB module. OTOH, with just one 512MB everything *seems* to be working fine, but, honestly, I'm not sure. > It is also generally unstable if set to anything over PC100 memory speed > in my experience (my machine has the same board). Hummm, nice to see that you have also experienced this. With 256 + 128, I had to use PC100 to have it work stably. > The memory speed detection doesn't work properly. I have found it > perfectly stable when set to PC100 in bios and using PC133 memory. It > seems to prefer having the extra margin. I'd obviously prefer to have everything working at PC133 speed, but wouldn't mind running at PC100 speed if I could use everything, since I sometimes need to use some large programs (for some dynamic programming problems). Thanks for sharing your experiences, -- Rog?rio Brito : rbrito@ime.usp.br : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito Homepage of the algorithms package : http://algorithms.berlios.de Homepage on freshmeat: http://freshmeat.net/projects/algorithms/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/