Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932067AbVJBUu5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 16:50:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932068AbVJBUu5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 16:50:57 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:53717 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932067AbVJBUu4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 16:50:56 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lexington Luthor Subject: Re: A possible idea for Linux: Save running programs to disk Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:21:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <433F0BF1.2020900@concannon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bb-82-108-13-253.ukonline.co.uk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 890 Lines: 19 lokum spand wrote: > > In fact moving processes from one machine to another would be a > brilliant feature at my work, since we run fairly large and > time-consuming simulations on electronic circuits. If the kernel could > natively support bouncing jobs back and forth, that would really be > something. Since we simulate with proprietary software, I suppose we > can't rely on the simulator being rewritten to support such special > libraries. > The OpenSSI patches to the Kernel can make a network of machines behave like a single system image with automatic process migration, among other things. http://openssi.org Regards, LL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/