Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751098AbVJBXcD (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:32:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751124AbVJBXcD (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:32:03 -0400 Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.42]:45819 "EHLO vms042pub.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751098AbVJBXcC (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:32:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:32:00 -0400 From: Gene Heskett Subject: Re: what's next for the linux kernel? In-reply-to: <4340627F.6010303@shaw.ca> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <200510021932.00969.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Organization: None, usuallly detectable by casual observers MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <4TiWy-4HQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <4340627F.6010303@shaw.ca> User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1754 Lines: 40 On Sunday 02 October 2005 18:43, Robert Hancock wrote: >Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> and, what is the linux kernel? >> >> it's a daft, monolithic design that is suitable and faster on >> single-processor systems, and that design is going to look _really_ >> outdated, really soon. > >Well, it sounds like it works pretty well on such things as 512 CPU >Altix systems, so it sounds like the suggestion that Linux is designed >solely for single-processor systems and isn't suitable for multicore, >hyperthreaded CPUs doesn't hold much water.. Ahh, yes and no, Robert. The un-answered question, for that 512 processor Altix system, would be "but does it run things 512 times faster?" Methinks not, by a very wide margin. Yes, do a lot of unrelated things fast maybe, but render a 30 megabyte page with ghostscript in 10 milliseconds? Never happen IMO. And Christoph in the next msg, calls him 1/2 drunk. He doesn't come across to me as being more than 1 beer drunk. And he does make some interesting points, so if they aren't valid, lets use proveable logic to shoot them down, not name calling and pointless rhetoric. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/